The venerable Italian brand Brionvega thinks the 60s and 70s are worth bringing back, or that at least some of the design sensibilities of the era warrant new life. The classic, groundbreaking Radiofonografio, divined in 1965 by two of the three Castiglioni brothers, Pier Giacomo and Achille, is making a new entrance as RR226. In 1965, the “musical component robot” was a home electronic marvel that in one sleekly designed device included a radio, amplifiers and a record player (for both 45s and 33s).
The modernized model has also a CD and DVD players but otherwise it is as close as possible to the original. The amplifiers are moveable which makes it possible to create different configurations both for visual and listening pleasure. Showcased at the Salone del Mobile in Milan in April, RR226 may be a while coming to a store near you. But like so many of the Castiglioni brothers’ objects, still produced and/or displayed by Zanotta, Flos, Artemide and MoMA, the Radiofonografio is most likely going to stay with us for yet another long period. - Tuija Seipell
Here are the first pictures that Alfa Romeo have released of its
sexy 8C Spider, to be introduced to the world at next months Geneva
Motor Show.
Based on the hard-topped 8C Competizione, the two-seat Spider featuring
a twin-layer fabric roof which can be raised at the press of a button,
is expected to hit 60mph in 4.2 seconds with a top speed of around
180mph. The mechanics will be similar to that of the Competizione as it
uses the same 4.7-litre V8 engine and six-speed semi-automatic gearbox.
As the limited run is just 500 vehicles, we expect to see all of these
selling like hotcakes and commanding more than their £130,000 price
tag. So roll up your sleeves and have your cheque books ready; the
fight to get one of these beauties is not going to be pretty. By Brendan McKnight
Here at The Cool Hunter, we strive to bring you the most cutting edge
and inspiring pieces of design. From houses to hotels walls to wine
racks, there isn’t much we won’t write about. All under the premise,
that if we like something, then, maybe you’ll like it as well.
But, there comes a time when we’re not quite sure. And if we don’t like
it, why are we telling you about it? This new house designed by Antonino Cardillo
has stumped us good and proper. Is it just another vacuous interior
that looks an awful lot like a museum? Or is it a very shrewd
example of how shapes and colours interact when placed next to each
other?
Built on a hillside somewhere in Italy, Cardillo has created a concrete
ellipse that dilates to the east and west. It also just happens
to look like a grey blob squatting on a hill. Inside you’re met with an
enormous curve that sweeps across the central hall, forcing the eye to
look down through the space at the brutal lines of the rest of the
house. A smooth exterior hides the phantasmagoria of shapes inside.
The other rooms are built around the dramatic opening. A kitchen at one
end, the guest room at the other. Up a darkened circular staircase lies
the mezzanine bedroom fitted out with the absolute minimal of
disruption to the form of the interior. It’s all wonderfully
cohesive. But at the same time, you can’t help but think, ‘where do all
the people go?’ The unrelenting stylising says this isn’t a space to be
lived in. Rather, it’s a place to be seen in.
But at the same time, you can’t help but wonder what life must be like
living here. The deep excavations in the outer wall reveal jagged
pockets of the outside world at random. Outside, forests and mountains.
Inside, lifeless concrete forged into geometric shapes. But the clever
thing about the positioning of the windows is, it lets different types
of light to fill different parts of the house. Direct sunlight beams
into the main hall, while refracted light from trees outside filters
into the smaller side windows. Creating instant moods inside according
to the weather outside.
As this is going on, the building remains in its original essence:
colourless or tending to grey. A challenging house that makes you love
it for its ingenuity, but hate it for its formality. Either way, we
can’t decide. What do you think?